Automobiles are not protected by the 2nd Amendment

We all know that a crucial part of the Government's "rah, rah, go green!" campaign is the use of automobiles. "Oil is bad! The earth is harmed! No more gasoline!" they tell us. The solutions they give us, however, lead to a hidden, undisclosed agenda.

The two most prominent alternative fuel sources are bio-fuels (ethanol) & electric motors (large blenders). As we move towards both of these, we begin to notice that bio-fuels are the preferred choice for private sector fuel companies. Have you seen the Mobil ads? "Biofuel breakthroughs" & the like.

As for electric motors, it's crystal clear what OBAMA wants for all of us to be driving: a blender-on-wheels. After the takeover of General Motors, the White House has made a concerted effort to encourage the purchase of the Chevrolet Volt, a 40-mile-a-charge, $40k, overpriced, failed attempt at getting us to buy "electric".

Also, let's remember that Obama gave $2 billion to Brazil for their own oil exploration, a country that is more advanced in bio-fuel technology than we are. A country that uses ethanol more regularly.

Let's not forget the uber-Government UN's negative view towards ethanol. They, too, have disdain for what amounts to, for all intents & purposes, an ALTERNATIVE liquid fuel component, one that might actually help alleviate the coming oil crisis.

We also have this "food-safety" bill that was forced upon us by the 111th Senate, a very unpopular bill that will affect the production of ETHANOL. This may explain the reason Harry Reid deemed it so vital, it had to pass before the new Congress took effect.

I began to wonder about all of this. We have a "go green" mentality, but there are two distinctly different goals here. Why is the Government not openly supporting bio-fuels? What happened to GREEN?

The difference between a liquid fuel & an electric motor, is that, at some level, electric motors will be made in concert with computer manufacturers. Liquid fuels allow indepedent manufacturing of non-computerized engines. In other words, the former is apples to apples, the latter is apples to oranges.

Another piece to this puzzle sheds some light on the true Government agenda. Not long ago, Google did a computer-GPS automobile control test run with one of their devices. Google deemed it a success, and inevitably will begin to find ways to sell this product.

Keeping in mind that Google & the White House have an unnatural relationship, it begs the question: Does the Government intend for us to ride in Government mandated, computer controlled vehicles? With such technology, an authoritarian will say to himself: "They don't NEED a car. They're helpless cattle. We need a super-computer with this Google GPS technology to eliminate automobile ownership. If they need to go somewhere, WE will provide a centralized Google brain that will eliminate day-to-day drivers. Need to go to the voting booth? Press a button, and your OBAMA car will be at your squat in half-an-hour, just like Domino's!"

Seriously, though, the Government wants to mandate computer controlled emergency braking on ALL vehicles. This is telling. Government wants to END automobile ownership. The clues are there. One simply has to put them together.