I read many posts where Patriots reassert the what they believe to be the document that Obama is seeking to invalidate, the Declaration of Independence. We scream about it from digital mountaintops. We're putting it on protest signs. We email our Congressmen about it. Soon, we'll be making video games about it.
As we continue down Obama's merry monarchistic path, observing his behavior, his associations, and his clouded personal history, I've concluded that it's not the Declaration of Independence he seeks to invalidate.
His beliefs aren't simply anti-American. Western culture as a whole seems to be Obama's target. His mentors must've really done quite a number on him. The term that Newt Gingrich gave for this phenomenon was "anti-colonialism", which does partly describe it, but it seems to go deeper with Obama.
Whoever his mentor was, he certainly did not believe in a free man of ANY kind, let alone those that championed the colonial era, which gave rise to America as we understand it today, at least, those of us that understand what it really means. It appears to me that his mentor must've viewed himself as being a part of some sort of distant royalty, probably African, and views the exploration of Liberty that America represents as the true villain. A bitterness that lies in the era of the British Empire, which also explains his desire to spurn the UK.
Obama goes waaaay back. He's not just anti-American. He's not just anti-colonial. He's anti-FREEman, as is described in a document that goes back 500 years prior to the Declaration of Independence. To place the Declaration of Independence as the core document in Obama's crosshairs isn't entirely accurate, in my opinion.
Those of you that have been to the National Archives know which document I'm referring to. It's the document that's displayed in the tour prior to the Declaration of Independence.
It's called the MAGNA CARTA. If you observe & examine Obama's behavior & carefully examine his speeches, and view it through that lens, the picture becomes clearer. Obama seeks to undo all the influence the British Empire had in the world prior to America. Obama views this as some twisted necessary burden to avenge those that were de-throned in his apparent ancestry, which we STILL can't entirely pinpoint.
Please feel free to comment. Thanks for reading.
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
GM sales in China don't make for a prosperous America
WOW! Great headline! GM almost outsells Toyota! Exciting! All those GM execs must be thrilled!
But wait! 2nd headline: GM sales in China outpace U.S. sales. And thus the GM good news train goes flying off the rails.
You might be thinking a pro-capitalist like me is being contradictory. But you'd be wrong. The devil is in the details.
Let's consider for a moment that Americans have been raging at corporations for exporting jobs overseas the last few decades, and I mean high profile jobs. Where have many of those jobs been going? You guessed it: CHINA!
While that's been going on, the unions have been actively preventing, thru political and social muscle, the right for the average American of obtaining employment free of hardship obligations external to his or her employer. Unions want to make the establishment of a job a PRIVILEGE that unions dole out.
Where does that leave us? Jobs Americans need are set up in China, while jobs Americans can't afford are in the hands of union mob bosses.
This all spells high profit & riches for executives, while the average American is left on the unemployment line. This is inherently un-American and leaves us with significantly less opportunities & less prosperity. A union controlled jobless market doesn't qualify.
But wait! 2nd headline: GM sales in China outpace U.S. sales. And thus the GM good news train goes flying off the rails.
You might be thinking a pro-capitalist like me is being contradictory. But you'd be wrong. The devil is in the details.
Let's consider for a moment that Americans have been raging at corporations for exporting jobs overseas the last few decades, and I mean high profile jobs. Where have many of those jobs been going? You guessed it: CHINA!
While that's been going on, the unions have been actively preventing, thru political and social muscle, the right for the average American of obtaining employment free of hardship obligations external to his or her employer. Unions want to make the establishment of a job a PRIVILEGE that unions dole out.
Where does that leave us? Jobs Americans need are set up in China, while jobs Americans can't afford are in the hands of union mob bosses.
This all spells high profit & riches for executives, while the average American is left on the unemployment line. This is inherently un-American and leaves us with significantly less opportunities & less prosperity. A union controlled jobless market doesn't qualify.
Monday, January 24, 2011
What is the DOD doing with our GPS systems?
No broad, public announcement of any kind, here is a clip from an email I just recieved:
THIS IS STRAIGHT FROM THE FEDS! I DO NOT KNOW JUST HOW THIS WILL IMPACT US BUT BE AWARE>
The Department of Defense will conduct GPS tests on January 20th through February
22nd, 2011. During testing, the GPS signal may be unreliable or unavailable.
A. Location: Centered at 304906N/0802811W or the location know as 105.25
degrees and 52.1 NM from the SSI VOR.
B. Dates and times: GPS testing is scheduled on January 20th through February 11th,
2011 from 0000-0245 UTC daily and February 15th through February 22nd, 2011
from 0000-0245 UTC daily. These tests may not be concurrent so pilots are
advised to check NOTAMS frequently for possible changes prior to operating in the
area.
C. Duration: Several test events will be conducted and will be active for 45 minutes
followed by 15 minutes of off time.
D. During testing, GPS will be unreliable and may be unavailable with in a circle with
a radius of 370NM and centered at 304906N/0802811W or the location known as
105.25 degrees and 52.1 NM from the SSI VOR at FL400; decreasing in area with
a decrease in altitude to a circle with a radius of 325NM at FL250; a circle with a
radius of 260NM at 10,000FT MSL and a circle with a radius of 215NM at 4,000FT
AGL.
E. Pilots are highly recommended to report anomalies during testing to the
appropriate ARTCC to assist in the determination of the extent of GPS degradation
during tests.
THIS IS STRAIGHT FROM THE FEDS! I DO NOT KNOW JUST HOW THIS WILL IMPACT US BUT BE AWARE>
The Department of Defense will conduct GPS tests on January 20th through February
22nd, 2011. During testing, the GPS signal may be unreliable or unavailable.
A. Location: Centered at 304906N/0802811W or the location know as 105.25
degrees and 52.1 NM from the SSI VOR.
B. Dates and times: GPS testing is scheduled on January 20th through February 11th,
2011 from 0000-0245 UTC daily and February 15th through February 22nd, 2011
from 0000-0245 UTC daily. These tests may not be concurrent so pilots are
advised to check NOTAMS frequently for possible changes prior to operating in the
area.
C. Duration: Several test events will be conducted and will be active for 45 minutes
followed by 15 minutes of off time.
D. During testing, GPS will be unreliable and may be unavailable with in a circle with
a radius of 370NM and centered at 304906N/0802811W or the location known as
105.25 degrees and 52.1 NM from the SSI VOR at FL400; decreasing in area with
a decrease in altitude to a circle with a radius of 325NM at FL250; a circle with a
radius of 260NM at 10,000FT MSL and a circle with a radius of 215NM at 4,000FT
AGL.
E. Pilots are highly recommended to report anomalies during testing to the
appropriate ARTCC to assist in the determination of the extent of GPS degradation
during tests.
Sunday, January 23, 2011
Automobiles are not protected by the 2nd Amendment
We all know that a crucial part of the Government's "rah, rah, go green!" campaign is the use of automobiles. "Oil is bad! The earth is harmed! No more gasoline!" they tell us. The solutions they give us, however, lead to a hidden, undisclosed agenda.
The two most prominent alternative fuel sources are bio-fuels (ethanol) & electric motors (large blenders). As we move towards both of these, we begin to notice that bio-fuels are the preferred choice for private sector fuel companies. Have you seen the Mobil ads? "Biofuel breakthroughs" & the like.
As for electric motors, it's crystal clear what OBAMA wants for all of us to be driving: a blender-on-wheels. After the takeover of General Motors, the White House has made a concerted effort to encourage the purchase of the Chevrolet Volt, a 40-mile-a-charge, $40k, overpriced, failed attempt at getting us to buy "electric".
Also, let's remember that Obama gave $2 billion to Brazil for their own oil exploration, a country that is more advanced in bio-fuel technology than we are. A country that uses ethanol more regularly.
Let's not forget the uber-Government UN's negative view towards ethanol. They, too, have disdain for what amounts to, for all intents & purposes, an ALTERNATIVE liquid fuel component, one that might actually help alleviate the coming oil crisis.
We also have this "food-safety" bill that was forced upon us by the 111th Senate, a very unpopular bill that will affect the production of ETHANOL. This may explain the reason Harry Reid deemed it so vital, it had to pass before the new Congress took effect.
I began to wonder about all of this. We have a "go green" mentality, but there are two distinctly different goals here. Why is the Government not openly supporting bio-fuels? What happened to GREEN?
The difference between a liquid fuel & an electric motor, is that, at some level, electric motors will be made in concert with computer manufacturers. Liquid fuels allow indepedent manufacturing of non-computerized engines. In other words, the former is apples to apples, the latter is apples to oranges.
Another piece to this puzzle sheds some light on the true Government agenda. Not long ago, Google did a computer-GPS automobile control test run with one of their devices. Google deemed it a success, and inevitably will begin to find ways to sell this product.
Keeping in mind that Google & the White House have an unnatural relationship, it begs the question: Does the Government intend for us to ride in Government mandated, computer controlled vehicles? With such technology, an authoritarian will say to himself: "They don't NEED a car. They're helpless cattle. We need a super-computer with this Google GPS technology to eliminate automobile ownership. If they need to go somewhere, WE will provide a centralized Google brain that will eliminate day-to-day drivers. Need to go to the voting booth? Press a button, and your OBAMA car will be at your squat in half-an-hour, just like Domino's!"
Seriously, though, the Government wants to mandate computer controlled emergency braking on ALL vehicles. This is telling. Government wants to END automobile ownership. The clues are there. One simply has to put them together.
The two most prominent alternative fuel sources are bio-fuels (ethanol) & electric motors (large blenders). As we move towards both of these, we begin to notice that bio-fuels are the preferred choice for private sector fuel companies. Have you seen the Mobil ads? "Biofuel breakthroughs" & the like.
As for electric motors, it's crystal clear what OBAMA wants for all of us to be driving: a blender-on-wheels. After the takeover of General Motors, the White House has made a concerted effort to encourage the purchase of the Chevrolet Volt, a 40-mile-a-charge, $40k, overpriced, failed attempt at getting us to buy "electric".
Also, let's remember that Obama gave $2 billion to Brazil for their own oil exploration, a country that is more advanced in bio-fuel technology than we are. A country that uses ethanol more regularly.
Let's not forget the uber-Government UN's negative view towards ethanol. They, too, have disdain for what amounts to, for all intents & purposes, an ALTERNATIVE liquid fuel component, one that might actually help alleviate the coming oil crisis.
We also have this "food-safety" bill that was forced upon us by the 111th Senate, a very unpopular bill that will affect the production of ETHANOL. This may explain the reason Harry Reid deemed it so vital, it had to pass before the new Congress took effect.
I began to wonder about all of this. We have a "go green" mentality, but there are two distinctly different goals here. Why is the Government not openly supporting bio-fuels? What happened to GREEN?
The difference between a liquid fuel & an electric motor, is that, at some level, electric motors will be made in concert with computer manufacturers. Liquid fuels allow indepedent manufacturing of non-computerized engines. In other words, the former is apples to apples, the latter is apples to oranges.
Another piece to this puzzle sheds some light on the true Government agenda. Not long ago, Google did a computer-GPS automobile control test run with one of their devices. Google deemed it a success, and inevitably will begin to find ways to sell this product.
Keeping in mind that Google & the White House have an unnatural relationship, it begs the question: Does the Government intend for us to ride in Government mandated, computer controlled vehicles? With such technology, an authoritarian will say to himself: "They don't NEED a car. They're helpless cattle. We need a super-computer with this Google GPS technology to eliminate automobile ownership. If they need to go somewhere, WE will provide a centralized Google brain that will eliminate day-to-day drivers. Need to go to the voting booth? Press a button, and your OBAMA car will be at your squat in half-an-hour, just like Domino's!"
Seriously, though, the Government wants to mandate computer controlled emergency braking on ALL vehicles. This is telling. Government wants to END automobile ownership. The clues are there. One simply has to put them together.
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Liberal thinking 101 (my oldie but goodie)
A. AIDS is not the fault of decadent behaviour of those afflicted. It is the fault of greedy people that don't want the government to steal their money for the research to cure it
B. It is more important to determine at conception who is prone to a genetic disease than it is to cure it. Society needn't be financially burdened with humans that need constant medical care. Encourage or force mothers to abort, even partial-birth
C. Victims of genetically acquired diseases don't deserve mercy. Their mothers are responsible for not aborting them
D. The elderly have outlived their usefulness. Their resources must be confiscated and their health care eliminated
E. Wars happen because evil nations try to defend themselves
F. God may or may not exist, but Government is certain and must be given authority to control our lives
G. People that have the audacity to better their lives and those around them need to be punished. How dare they even think they can make the world better?
H. Worsen the lives of those around you. No matter how bad life gets, you have the comfort of knowing your neighbor is suffering, too.
B. It is more important to determine at conception who is prone to a genetic disease than it is to cure it. Society needn't be financially burdened with humans that need constant medical care. Encourage or force mothers to abort, even partial-birth
C. Victims of genetically acquired diseases don't deserve mercy. Their mothers are responsible for not aborting them
D. The elderly have outlived their usefulness. Their resources must be confiscated and their health care eliminated
E. Wars happen because evil nations try to defend themselves
F. God may or may not exist, but Government is certain and must be given authority to control our lives
G. People that have the audacity to better their lives and those around them need to be punished. How dare they even think they can make the world better?
H. Worsen the lives of those around you. No matter how bad life gets, you have the comfort of knowing your neighbor is suffering, too.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
