Is the Osama Bin Laden strike just the latest example of Cloward-Piven?

I was listening to Rush go over all the various media reactions to Obama's appearance at Ground Zero. Rush made some great points along the way. The media is covering up for Obama, and in doing so, has to praise President Bush in the process.

Then he brought up Alan Dershowitz: It's not important who was killed [in Abottabad] but HOW they were killed." Note the emphasis on "How". Dershowitz was clearly outlining an argument for potential criminal wrongdoing by the Administration or the Military. As Rush continued to point out, 9/11 interviews and investigations are still going on. This is something the radical left feeds on, lives for.

What was going on before Bin Laden, before Trump? LIBYA. Dennis Kucinich & Vice President Joe Biden were asked by the media about Obama's strike on Gahdafi being Constitutional. They promptly responded that Striking another nation which is not an immediate threat to the United States, without Congressional approval, is an impeachable offense. Furthermore, a well-known Attorney in Republican circles has drafted articles of Impeachment based on this very item and submitted them to Congress recently.

So now I wonder, was this just another one of Obama's attempts to overwhelm the Justice system, Cloward-Piven style? He's keeping the far left busy with outrage and a burning desire to put someone's head on a platter with all this War Obama's commiting.

This attack overwhelms the system with investigations, interviews and interrogations. I doubt the left will have enough time to sort out all the wrongs committed by this White House before 2012.