The birth certificate proves something very important about our so-called President. I know many pundits on the right (as well as the left) see the whole issue and scoff at it. For a long time I angered at them too, as Obama continued to ignore the rest of us with the issue of his birth. I'm going to explain, in more detail, why it is important that conservatives address the issue of his birth certificate.
The request for the birth certificate from some of us so-called "birthers" was never about him being Kenyan, Canadian, Hawaiian, Communist, Keynesian, or even about transparency. It was about his CHARACTER plain and simple. He wanted to lead our nation in a time of War. He wanted to lead our nation in a time of economic turbulence. The least he could do was calm the electorate waters by releasing it so we could trust him, just as we release our information upon request to any Government official with sufficient authority.
In the midst of all our turmoil, then-candidate Obama chose a path that was petty and bitter, He ignored & ridiculed those of us that requested from him some of the most basic information about any of us. Why hide it? You want to be President? Be open, honest, and humble about it, maybe I would vote for you. Personally, I disdained McCain. I'm not saying I would've voted for Obama, but I might not have voted for McCain given that Obama was forthright with me.
The release of the birth certificate at this moment in time expands on Barack Hussein Obama's behavior during the "Beer Summit". Let us recall how quick Obama was to judge the police wrongly, and how he never, NEVER accepted that he did anything wrong. He offered up racism AND elitism towards the "poor white cop" with a beer at the White House, Obama's way of responding to wrongly judging the officer who DID HIS JOB, responsibly I might add. It is thug-like behavior.
The birth certificate further evidences Obama's obvious elitism towards the rest of us "little people". Obama views us all as little more than serfs that don't deserve even a simple gesture of goodwill by allowing us to see his birth information. In his mind, only a wealthy Democrat contributor can even bother him to pick up the phone and call his minions to do the "work" of making the long form public. Remember the middle finger at the campaign rally? Or how about the way he used his dying grandmother for political gain? Ah, the many examples of Obama bitterness, let me count the ways...
What makes the birth certificate issue all the more tragic about Barack Obama, the man, is that he dwells on insignificant pissing contests with others that he sees as his social level of adversary. He is a pitiful soul! In this case, with Donald Trump, who has been harping on the lack of Obama's birth certificate for 3 or so weeks now, Obama did not release the document for our benefit. He sees Donald Trump as the "rich guy" that is the enemy Obama champions as the evil of the world his entire adult life, and seeks to humiliate Trump by fish hooking us (more elitism by Obama) with the birth certificate: See peasants? Donald Trump is wrong. I am worthy!
Obama did something here that validated all his critics. I actually think it would've been better for him to keep the birth cert under lock and key. This isn't just "Here it is, now go away" like Obama wants it to be. This has a Nixon-Watergate tone to it. Obama engaged in obstruction and if Watergate is any indication, there will be calls for Obama to resign. Remember that what forced Nixon's resignation was the fact that he held on to the circumstances of the Watergate hotel break-in until the pressure of impeachment became apparent and inevitable.
Barack Hussein Obama, the man, has not, nor ever will be, fit for office. He is a walking, living, breathing calamity, and the recent release of the long form birth certificate is more proof of that.
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Saturday, March 12, 2011
Media & flawed perceptions resulting from interviews with so-called "experts"
I know, I know. We could write an entire encyclopaedia on all the awful bias the media spills on on us every day. We have to spend hours sifting thru reports that are full of crap, just to get to the 15 seconds of facts that are really the only things that matter. They have to constantly infuse their own spin on the news, to satisfy whatever hysteria they're feeling at the moment. This one, however, is quite serious.
Yes, of course, I'm fully aware that a major disaster is quite likely in the event the Japan Reactors melt. Barring all this, one has to keep in mind that ALL energy sources worthy of use come with their own level of danger. Nuclear power is clean, safe, & limitless ... when it's properly contained. That very characteristic comes with an equal disadvantage: The danger of nuclear poisoning.
I just saw FOX News do an interview with Bill Nye, "The Science Guy", so FOX could report his comments on the Nuclear situation going on in Japan. Mr. Nye was classified as a "Mechanical Engineer". Now, while I'm certain Mr. Nye has extensive fundamental knowledge on how to design a cooling system for a majority of mechanical applications, I would like to know, when was the last time Mr. Nye certified a set of plans for a cooling system design on a nuclear reactor? Better yet, when was the last time Mr. Nye certified a set of plans on ANY mechanical design project? Where are his Nuclear credentials?
FOX didn't bother giving us his most recent resume. The last time I saw "The Science Guy", he was too busy pitching GLOBAL WARMING as a valid scientific theory. That right there told me Mr. Nye "The Science Guy" is nothing more than another TV everyone-love-me hack. He is absolutely clueless as to how to aid in nuclear containment, so his automatic response was "too many variables to use nuclear technology". That's not engineering Mr. Nye, that's giving up before you try. Are you an ENGINEER or a NOT? Don't use your engineering credentials if YOU DON'T ACTIVELY PRACTICE IT.
This is irresponsible, to say the least. "Fairless & Imbalanced" is what I think of FOX, and interviews like this prove that FOX openly accepts TV hackery to gain viewers. Not worth the bandwidth they absorb. Stick to radio & trusted news Internet sites, where facts & truth prevail.
Yes, of course, I'm fully aware that a major disaster is quite likely in the event the Japan Reactors melt. Barring all this, one has to keep in mind that ALL energy sources worthy of use come with their own level of danger. Nuclear power is clean, safe, & limitless ... when it's properly contained. That very characteristic comes with an equal disadvantage: The danger of nuclear poisoning.
I just saw FOX News do an interview with Bill Nye, "The Science Guy", so FOX could report his comments on the Nuclear situation going on in Japan. Mr. Nye was classified as a "Mechanical Engineer". Now, while I'm certain Mr. Nye has extensive fundamental knowledge on how to design a cooling system for a majority of mechanical applications, I would like to know, when was the last time Mr. Nye certified a set of plans for a cooling system design on a nuclear reactor? Better yet, when was the last time Mr. Nye certified a set of plans on ANY mechanical design project? Where are his Nuclear credentials?
FOX didn't bother giving us his most recent resume. The last time I saw "The Science Guy", he was too busy pitching GLOBAL WARMING as a valid scientific theory. That right there told me Mr. Nye "The Science Guy" is nothing more than another TV everyone-love-me hack. He is absolutely clueless as to how to aid in nuclear containment, so his automatic response was "too many variables to use nuclear technology". That's not engineering Mr. Nye, that's giving up before you try. Are you an ENGINEER or a NOT? Don't use your engineering credentials if YOU DON'T ACTIVELY PRACTICE IT.
This is irresponsible, to say the least. "Fairless & Imbalanced" is what I think of FOX, and interviews like this prove that FOX openly accepts TV hackery to gain viewers. Not worth the bandwidth they absorb. Stick to radio & trusted news Internet sites, where facts & truth prevail.
Wednesday, March 09, 2011
Big Brother is targeting Smartphones
Have you heard any of the latest news clips on radio or TV regarding smartphone usage? The goody-too-shoes media is starting to report this, heavily I might add.
The latest report was some "expert" saying that "cellphones" (effing morons; they don't even know the proper name of the offending device) shouldn't be used "at dinner, bank tellers, at church, and PUBLIC BATHROOMS!"
Since when did the media care that we use our smartphones at church? The media is anti-Christian as part of their agenda, one would think they would be targeting the church for preventing attendees from using them, recommending lawyers for lawsuits even.
Woah! How criminal! I can't use my phone for my duty while I do my doody. How effing jealous are these liberals? Now they want a toilet police to monitor your smartphone usage on the can?
Let's tell it like it is. The media is PANICKED that we can very easily bypass THEM by texting or tweeting what we hear & know to each other. How dare we tell each other things without media input? We might give each other advice the media would otherwise be giving us!
Hey media ninnies, shut the f*ck up! You don't like me tweeting on my tush? KISS MY ASS!!!!
The latest report was some "expert" saying that "cellphones" (effing morons; they don't even know the proper name of the offending device) shouldn't be used "at dinner, bank tellers, at church, and PUBLIC BATHROOMS!"
Since when did the media care that we use our smartphones at church? The media is anti-Christian as part of their agenda, one would think they would be targeting the church for preventing attendees from using them, recommending lawyers for lawsuits even.
Woah! How criminal! I can't use my phone for my duty while I do my doody. How effing jealous are these liberals? Now they want a toilet police to monitor your smartphone usage on the can?
Let's tell it like it is. The media is PANICKED that we can very easily bypass THEM by texting or tweeting what we hear & know to each other. How dare we tell each other things without media input? We might give each other advice the media would otherwise be giving us!
Hey media ninnies, shut the f*ck up! You don't like me tweeting on my tush? KISS MY ASS!!!!
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Don't buy into the oil "crisis" just yet...
I'm not buying all this OIL OH MY GOSH CHICKEN LITTLE IS FALLING OUT OF THE SKY bit just yet. Oil prices above $100 a barrel? Really? You mean to tell me we've consumed that much more oil in the past year & a half? Let's consider some recent history regarding oil & the prices that are being set for it.
First of all, back in 2008, oil speculators drove the price up to about $150 a barrel, for reasons a financial layman such as myself still have yet to fully understand. What I do recall is that the economy went into the tank, leaving no room for gasoline (pun intended).
What was the result? America began naturally to scale back, and SUBSTANTIALLY I might add. Oil investors & producers were being being left with oil GLUTS. In other words, there were plenty of available barrels of oil WITH NO ONE TO BUY THEM.
It doesn't take a genius to figure out what happens to a commodity that loses demand when market forces take over. Oil dropped to almost $30 a barrel in the next several months. America chose to pass on high oil prices in large quantities.
Let's keep in mind, prior to all of this, prior to the start of the Iraq & Afgahn wars, European corporatists invested in oil were profiting on the backs of oppressed Iraqis for $11 A BARREL. How was this possible? Syria was funneling black market oil from countries like Iraq for people like Soros to then turn around & sell for almost 4 times their price! European corporatists were a bit pissed off when we invaded Iraq, to say the least. This must be payback.
Back to the present. America's oil consumption HAS NOT INCREASED SUBSTANTIALLY since the $30 a barrel price drop. The world, in fact, is going thru one recession after another, just like we are.And how did OPEC react? "We're going to DROP oil production to offset reduced consumption." Oil gluts ARE STILL OCCURRING TODAY.
Reduced oil production means reduced workforce, and reduced work hours. THAT'S what's contributing to the unrest in the Middle East. America is nowhere near consumption levels of 4 or more years ago, and combined with recent inflation of basic goods (Thanks Geithner & QE2), has caused hunger & poverty of epic proportions. Foreign oil barons are willing to let production suffer to offset losses attributed to recession & the Iraq war.
We're experiencing an oil price "shell game". The fact is we're all at the mercy of foreign oil corporatists (and a virtually non-existent shelf-life), that want to keep the barrel of oil at a exorbitantly above-market price. They have stored oil that they refuse to sell for less than a determined price, are willing to put employment for oil production out to pasture to do so. "Quantitative easing" only contributes to the idea of accepting oil at a $150+ a barrel price range as the norm. We're being punished for defending the innocent in Iraq, not just by our own liberals, but by oil fascists abroad.
We need to keep our wits about us. This is a game we can win, this is still America. Get Obama out and send the oil fascists with him.
First of all, back in 2008, oil speculators drove the price up to about $150 a barrel, for reasons a financial layman such as myself still have yet to fully understand. What I do recall is that the economy went into the tank, leaving no room for gasoline (pun intended).
What was the result? America began naturally to scale back, and SUBSTANTIALLY I might add. Oil investors & producers were being being left with oil GLUTS. In other words, there were plenty of available barrels of oil WITH NO ONE TO BUY THEM.
It doesn't take a genius to figure out what happens to a commodity that loses demand when market forces take over. Oil dropped to almost $30 a barrel in the next several months. America chose to pass on high oil prices in large quantities.
Let's keep in mind, prior to all of this, prior to the start of the Iraq & Afgahn wars, European corporatists invested in oil were profiting on the backs of oppressed Iraqis for $11 A BARREL. How was this possible? Syria was funneling black market oil from countries like Iraq for people like Soros to then turn around & sell for almost 4 times their price! European corporatists were a bit pissed off when we invaded Iraq, to say the least. This must be payback.
Back to the present. America's oil consumption HAS NOT INCREASED SUBSTANTIALLY since the $30 a barrel price drop. The world, in fact, is going thru one recession after another, just like we are.And how did OPEC react? "We're going to DROP oil production to offset reduced consumption." Oil gluts ARE STILL OCCURRING TODAY.
Reduced oil production means reduced workforce, and reduced work hours. THAT'S what's contributing to the unrest in the Middle East. America is nowhere near consumption levels of 4 or more years ago, and combined with recent inflation of basic goods (Thanks Geithner & QE2), has caused hunger & poverty of epic proportions. Foreign oil barons are willing to let production suffer to offset losses attributed to recession & the Iraq war.
We're experiencing an oil price "shell game". The fact is we're all at the mercy of foreign oil corporatists (and a virtually non-existent shelf-life), that want to keep the barrel of oil at a exorbitantly above-market price. They have stored oil that they refuse to sell for less than a determined price, are willing to put employment for oil production out to pasture to do so. "Quantitative easing" only contributes to the idea of accepting oil at a $150+ a barrel price range as the norm. We're being punished for defending the innocent in Iraq, not just by our own liberals, but by oil fascists abroad.
We need to keep our wits about us. This is a game we can win, this is still America. Get Obama out and send the oil fascists with him.
Friday, February 11, 2011
CPAC got what it deserved ... and then some
The new and improved CPAC gave way to a whole lot of entertainment, not unlike a circus show that strolled into town.
What do I mean? Well, 1st off, let's take for example how they recklessly snubbed their longtime religious support by allowing groups such as GOProud entry. While I'm not any-phobic, the idea that a group is formed based on what is, for all intents and purposes, a non-natural behavior, is incompatible with authentic conservatism, and has no true foundation.
Also, the Ron Paul-ers ruined the evening. They couldn't wait to jeer & mock Donald Rumsfeld &, by default, Dick Cheney, making for a mockery of the entire event. It got to the point that longtime Hillary Clinton supporter Donald Trump (& maybe liberal mole) had to tell the Paul-ers their candidate is "unelectable". It seems appropriate that Trump's somewhat clownish character on TV was appropriate for this year's CPAC.
Add to the fact that they scheduled, and I think intentionally, their event directly opposite NASCAR media day. I know some will say "why does that matter?" It matters because while CPAC is entertaining anti-family groups such as GOProud, they are snubbing REAL FAMILIES that want to spend time doing something wholesome with their children, CPAC need not apply.
Why did this happen? Ignorance. I'm watching many conservatives make the same mistakes that brought us a Democrat majority & an Obama victory. You can't snub traditional support to try to "big tent" yourself with fringe political groups like the Ron Paul-ers, GOProud & the pro-aborters.
We have a fractured coalition of alarmists too! We have the Glenn Beck alarmists vs. the Ron Paul/Alex Jones conspiracy theorists. Wonderful! I can't wait to big tent myself with the mothership!
Mind you, none of this is a good sign for a relationship with the Tea Party. Tea Party folks are family oriented. If this is what the GOP thinks will win them 2012, I got news for you: the Tea Party will abandon you in a heartbeat. If this keeps up, we will have a whole lot of 3 way races, mark my words.
There are two groups driving this movement: former liberals & libertarians that have had there eyes opened recently, & wet-behind-the-ears young-uns (some that get their paychecks from the GOP establishment). Their purpose for this event was more about their personal need for social interaction than truly advancing conservative causes.
I even had a friend tell me "THESE ARE HARD CORE CONSERVATIVES!" Really? Where was Rush Limbaugh? Mark Levin? Sean Hannity? Did Ronald Reagan get honest mention? Yeah OK. This was more like a loony libertarian freak show. This is what happens when you let "new conservatives" run the show. They revert to trying to bring in all the groups that either willfully or ignorantly wind up voting Democrat.
So there you have it. Let's try to make CPAC12 about CONSERVATISM instead of BIGTENTISM shall we?
What do I mean? Well, 1st off, let's take for example how they recklessly snubbed their longtime religious support by allowing groups such as GOProud entry. While I'm not any-phobic, the idea that a group is formed based on what is, for all intents and purposes, a non-natural behavior, is incompatible with authentic conservatism, and has no true foundation.
Also, the Ron Paul-ers ruined the evening. They couldn't wait to jeer & mock Donald Rumsfeld &, by default, Dick Cheney, making for a mockery of the entire event. It got to the point that longtime Hillary Clinton supporter Donald Trump (& maybe liberal mole) had to tell the Paul-ers their candidate is "unelectable". It seems appropriate that Trump's somewhat clownish character on TV was appropriate for this year's CPAC.
Add to the fact that they scheduled, and I think intentionally, their event directly opposite NASCAR media day. I know some will say "why does that matter?" It matters because while CPAC is entertaining anti-family groups such as GOProud, they are snubbing REAL FAMILIES that want to spend time doing something wholesome with their children, CPAC need not apply.
Why did this happen? Ignorance. I'm watching many conservatives make the same mistakes that brought us a Democrat majority & an Obama victory. You can't snub traditional support to try to "big tent" yourself with fringe political groups like the Ron Paul-ers, GOProud & the pro-aborters.
We have a fractured coalition of alarmists too! We have the Glenn Beck alarmists vs. the Ron Paul/Alex Jones conspiracy theorists. Wonderful! I can't wait to big tent myself with the mothership!
Mind you, none of this is a good sign for a relationship with the Tea Party. Tea Party folks are family oriented. If this is what the GOP thinks will win them 2012, I got news for you: the Tea Party will abandon you in a heartbeat. If this keeps up, we will have a whole lot of 3 way races, mark my words.
There are two groups driving this movement: former liberals & libertarians that have had there eyes opened recently, & wet-behind-the-ears young-uns (some that get their paychecks from the GOP establishment). Their purpose for this event was more about their personal need for social interaction than truly advancing conservative causes.
I even had a friend tell me "THESE ARE HARD CORE CONSERVATIVES!" Really? Where was Rush Limbaugh? Mark Levin? Sean Hannity? Did Ronald Reagan get honest mention? Yeah OK. This was more like a loony libertarian freak show. This is what happens when you let "new conservatives" run the show. They revert to trying to bring in all the groups that either willfully or ignorantly wind up voting Democrat.
So there you have it. Let's try to make CPAC12 about CONSERVATISM instead of BIGTENTISM shall we?
Saturday, February 05, 2011
If I were a Nigerian scam artist ...
Respected - Dear,
Good-Day!
How are you this morning? I know that you might see my mail coming to you as one of the mails you receives and you are not being surprise, with how you are going to be feeling over my mail message, please even we never knew before or meet through any means like (phone conversation or in person) consider this message as a request from a woman in dare need of your help, to relocate your President's birth certificate so I can live a new life.
I also find it very difficult to trust people but I have to use this medium to contact you for your co-operations and for security reason to avoid suspicions which I will disclose in due course and you will know me more, I know you might not trust my mail.
I am located in Kenya which I will disclose to you once am sure of your willingness to help me with this and really sure of your, Trust worthiness, Accountability and confidentiality.
I have a proposition for you which involve $18,500,000 Millions of US Dollar I have been offered for the sale of your President's birth certificate, Can I trust you to help me move this birth certificate?. All I need of you is assistance with Banking and Investment of any profitable Investment you may deem okay to help me transfer the sale of said birth certificate through you in your country.
I would like you to give this matter your deep immediate thought and looking forward to your response. Do have in mind that is going to be legitimate transaction but absolute confidentiality.
Best regards, and have a great day.
Ms.O.L
Good-Day!
How are you this morning? I know that you might see my mail coming to you as one of the mails you receives and you are not being surprise, with how you are going to be feeling over my mail message, please even we never knew before or meet through any means like (phone conversation or in person) consider this message as a request from a woman in dare need of your help, to relocate your President's birth certificate so I can live a new life.
I also find it very difficult to trust people but I have to use this medium to contact you for your co-operations and for security reason to avoid suspicions which I will disclose in due course and you will know me more, I know you might not trust my mail.
I am located in Kenya which I will disclose to you once am sure of your willingness to help me with this and really sure of your, Trust worthiness, Accountability and confidentiality.
I have a proposition for you which involve $18,500,000 Millions of US Dollar I have been offered for the sale of your President's birth certificate, Can I trust you to help me move this birth certificate?. All I need of you is assistance with Banking and Investment of any profitable Investment you may deem okay to help me transfer the sale of said birth certificate through you in your country.
I would like you to give this matter your deep immediate thought and looking forward to your response. Do have in mind that is going to be legitimate transaction but absolute confidentiality.
Best regards, and have a great day.
Ms.O.L
Wednesday, February 02, 2011
Will the REAL Egypt please stand up?
It turns out, after all this time, that the stories of the "Muslim takeover" of Egypt, "Persian invasion", Ahmedinjad, Iran, blah blah blah, are nothing more than media hype.
They are Obama media creations, something that we should be getting used to by now, but somehow we seem to think CNN FOX NBC CBS ABC are in the truth business. We need to get used to the fact that every BIG story by our media is a LIE, a big fat LIE, every day, all the time.
The REAL Egypt, as it turns out, is nothing at all like we're being "cattle fed". The real story is about Government eltitlements! See here: http://bit.ly/dEyuN5
Hosni Mubarak, at the behest of his wife (even he was reluctant to the idea), was grooming his son, Gamal Mubarak, as successor, while Egyptian army commanders were vacationing in WASHINGTON DC, As if this story can get any more suspicious towards Obama.
I'm just now reading that Anderson Cooper was "attacked" by pro-Mubarak protesters. How staged is this?
Something is amiss, and Obama has a lot to answer for ...
They are Obama media creations, something that we should be getting used to by now, but somehow we seem to think CNN FOX NBC CBS ABC are in the truth business. We need to get used to the fact that every BIG story by our media is a LIE, a big fat LIE, every day, all the time.
The REAL Egypt, as it turns out, is nothing at all like we're being "cattle fed". The real story is about Government eltitlements! See here: http://bit.ly/dEyuN5
Hosni Mubarak, at the behest of his wife (even he was reluctant to the idea), was grooming his son, Gamal Mubarak, as successor, while Egyptian army commanders were vacationing in WASHINGTON DC, As if this story can get any more suspicious towards Obama.
I'm just now reading that Anderson Cooper was "attacked" by pro-Mubarak protesters. How staged is this?
Something is amiss, and Obama has a lot to answer for ...
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Declaration of Independence? pffft ...
I read many posts where Patriots reassert the what they believe to be the document that Obama is seeking to invalidate, the Declaration of Independence. We scream about it from digital mountaintops. We're putting it on protest signs. We email our Congressmen about it. Soon, we'll be making video games about it.
As we continue down Obama's merry monarchistic path, observing his behavior, his associations, and his clouded personal history, I've concluded that it's not the Declaration of Independence he seeks to invalidate.
His beliefs aren't simply anti-American. Western culture as a whole seems to be Obama's target. His mentors must've really done quite a number on him. The term that Newt Gingrich gave for this phenomenon was "anti-colonialism", which does partly describe it, but it seems to go deeper with Obama.
Whoever his mentor was, he certainly did not believe in a free man of ANY kind, let alone those that championed the colonial era, which gave rise to America as we understand it today, at least, those of us that understand what it really means. It appears to me that his mentor must've viewed himself as being a part of some sort of distant royalty, probably African, and views the exploration of Liberty that America represents as the true villain. A bitterness that lies in the era of the British Empire, which also explains his desire to spurn the UK.
Obama goes waaaay back. He's not just anti-American. He's not just anti-colonial. He's anti-FREEman, as is described in a document that goes back 500 years prior to the Declaration of Independence. To place the Declaration of Independence as the core document in Obama's crosshairs isn't entirely accurate, in my opinion.
Those of you that have been to the National Archives know which document I'm referring to. It's the document that's displayed in the tour prior to the Declaration of Independence.
It's called the MAGNA CARTA. If you observe & examine Obama's behavior & carefully examine his speeches, and view it through that lens, the picture becomes clearer. Obama seeks to undo all the influence the British Empire had in the world prior to America. Obama views this as some twisted necessary burden to avenge those that were de-throned in his apparent ancestry, which we STILL can't entirely pinpoint.
Please feel free to comment. Thanks for reading.
As we continue down Obama's merry monarchistic path, observing his behavior, his associations, and his clouded personal history, I've concluded that it's not the Declaration of Independence he seeks to invalidate.
His beliefs aren't simply anti-American. Western culture as a whole seems to be Obama's target. His mentors must've really done quite a number on him. The term that Newt Gingrich gave for this phenomenon was "anti-colonialism", which does partly describe it, but it seems to go deeper with Obama.
Whoever his mentor was, he certainly did not believe in a free man of ANY kind, let alone those that championed the colonial era, which gave rise to America as we understand it today, at least, those of us that understand what it really means. It appears to me that his mentor must've viewed himself as being a part of some sort of distant royalty, probably African, and views the exploration of Liberty that America represents as the true villain. A bitterness that lies in the era of the British Empire, which also explains his desire to spurn the UK.
Obama goes waaaay back. He's not just anti-American. He's not just anti-colonial. He's anti-FREEman, as is described in a document that goes back 500 years prior to the Declaration of Independence. To place the Declaration of Independence as the core document in Obama's crosshairs isn't entirely accurate, in my opinion.
Those of you that have been to the National Archives know which document I'm referring to. It's the document that's displayed in the tour prior to the Declaration of Independence.
It's called the MAGNA CARTA. If you observe & examine Obama's behavior & carefully examine his speeches, and view it through that lens, the picture becomes clearer. Obama seeks to undo all the influence the British Empire had in the world prior to America. Obama views this as some twisted necessary burden to avenge those that were de-throned in his apparent ancestry, which we STILL can't entirely pinpoint.
Please feel free to comment. Thanks for reading.
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
GM sales in China don't make for a prosperous America
WOW! Great headline! GM almost outsells Toyota! Exciting! All those GM execs must be thrilled!
But wait! 2nd headline: GM sales in China outpace U.S. sales. And thus the GM good news train goes flying off the rails.
You might be thinking a pro-capitalist like me is being contradictory. But you'd be wrong. The devil is in the details.
Let's consider for a moment that Americans have been raging at corporations for exporting jobs overseas the last few decades, and I mean high profile jobs. Where have many of those jobs been going? You guessed it: CHINA!
While that's been going on, the unions have been actively preventing, thru political and social muscle, the right for the average American of obtaining employment free of hardship obligations external to his or her employer. Unions want to make the establishment of a job a PRIVILEGE that unions dole out.
Where does that leave us? Jobs Americans need are set up in China, while jobs Americans can't afford are in the hands of union mob bosses.
This all spells high profit & riches for executives, while the average American is left on the unemployment line. This is inherently un-American and leaves us with significantly less opportunities & less prosperity. A union controlled jobless market doesn't qualify.
But wait! 2nd headline: GM sales in China outpace U.S. sales. And thus the GM good news train goes flying off the rails.
You might be thinking a pro-capitalist like me is being contradictory. But you'd be wrong. The devil is in the details.
Let's consider for a moment that Americans have been raging at corporations for exporting jobs overseas the last few decades, and I mean high profile jobs. Where have many of those jobs been going? You guessed it: CHINA!
While that's been going on, the unions have been actively preventing, thru political and social muscle, the right for the average American of obtaining employment free of hardship obligations external to his or her employer. Unions want to make the establishment of a job a PRIVILEGE that unions dole out.
Where does that leave us? Jobs Americans need are set up in China, while jobs Americans can't afford are in the hands of union mob bosses.
This all spells high profit & riches for executives, while the average American is left on the unemployment line. This is inherently un-American and leaves us with significantly less opportunities & less prosperity. A union controlled jobless market doesn't qualify.
Monday, January 24, 2011
What is the DOD doing with our GPS systems?
No broad, public announcement of any kind, here is a clip from an email I just recieved:
THIS IS STRAIGHT FROM THE FEDS! I DO NOT KNOW JUST HOW THIS WILL IMPACT US BUT BE AWARE>
The Department of Defense will conduct GPS tests on January 20th through February
22nd, 2011. During testing, the GPS signal may be unreliable or unavailable.
A. Location: Centered at 304906N/0802811W or the location know as 105.25
degrees and 52.1 NM from the SSI VOR.
B. Dates and times: GPS testing is scheduled on January 20th through February 11th,
2011 from 0000-0245 UTC daily and February 15th through February 22nd, 2011
from 0000-0245 UTC daily. These tests may not be concurrent so pilots are
advised to check NOTAMS frequently for possible changes prior to operating in the
area.
C. Duration: Several test events will be conducted and will be active for 45 minutes
followed by 15 minutes of off time.
D. During testing, GPS will be unreliable and may be unavailable with in a circle with
a radius of 370NM and centered at 304906N/0802811W or the location known as
105.25 degrees and 52.1 NM from the SSI VOR at FL400; decreasing in area with
a decrease in altitude to a circle with a radius of 325NM at FL250; a circle with a
radius of 260NM at 10,000FT MSL and a circle with a radius of 215NM at 4,000FT
AGL.
E. Pilots are highly recommended to report anomalies during testing to the
appropriate ARTCC to assist in the determination of the extent of GPS degradation
during tests.
THIS IS STRAIGHT FROM THE FEDS! I DO NOT KNOW JUST HOW THIS WILL IMPACT US BUT BE AWARE>
The Department of Defense will conduct GPS tests on January 20th through February
22nd, 2011. During testing, the GPS signal may be unreliable or unavailable.
A. Location: Centered at 304906N/0802811W or the location know as 105.25
degrees and 52.1 NM from the SSI VOR.
B. Dates and times: GPS testing is scheduled on January 20th through February 11th,
2011 from 0000-0245 UTC daily and February 15th through February 22nd, 2011
from 0000-0245 UTC daily. These tests may not be concurrent so pilots are
advised to check NOTAMS frequently for possible changes prior to operating in the
area.
C. Duration: Several test events will be conducted and will be active for 45 minutes
followed by 15 minutes of off time.
D. During testing, GPS will be unreliable and may be unavailable with in a circle with
a radius of 370NM and centered at 304906N/0802811W or the location known as
105.25 degrees and 52.1 NM from the SSI VOR at FL400; decreasing in area with
a decrease in altitude to a circle with a radius of 325NM at FL250; a circle with a
radius of 260NM at 10,000FT MSL and a circle with a radius of 215NM at 4,000FT
AGL.
E. Pilots are highly recommended to report anomalies during testing to the
appropriate ARTCC to assist in the determination of the extent of GPS degradation
during tests.
Sunday, January 23, 2011
Automobiles are not protected by the 2nd Amendment
We all know that a crucial part of the Government's "rah, rah, go green!" campaign is the use of automobiles. "Oil is bad! The earth is harmed! No more gasoline!" they tell us. The solutions they give us, however, lead to a hidden, undisclosed agenda.
The two most prominent alternative fuel sources are bio-fuels (ethanol) & electric motors (large blenders). As we move towards both of these, we begin to notice that bio-fuels are the preferred choice for private sector fuel companies. Have you seen the Mobil ads? "Biofuel breakthroughs" & the like.
As for electric motors, it's crystal clear what OBAMA wants for all of us to be driving: a blender-on-wheels. After the takeover of General Motors, the White House has made a concerted effort to encourage the purchase of the Chevrolet Volt, a 40-mile-a-charge, $40k, overpriced, failed attempt at getting us to buy "electric".
Also, let's remember that Obama gave $2 billion to Brazil for their own oil exploration, a country that is more advanced in bio-fuel technology than we are. A country that uses ethanol more regularly.
Let's not forget the uber-Government UN's negative view towards ethanol. They, too, have disdain for what amounts to, for all intents & purposes, an ALTERNATIVE liquid fuel component, one that might actually help alleviate the coming oil crisis.
We also have this "food-safety" bill that was forced upon us by the 111th Senate, a very unpopular bill that will affect the production of ETHANOL. This may explain the reason Harry Reid deemed it so vital, it had to pass before the new Congress took effect.
I began to wonder about all of this. We have a "go green" mentality, but there are two distinctly different goals here. Why is the Government not openly supporting bio-fuels? What happened to GREEN?
The difference between a liquid fuel & an electric motor, is that, at some level, electric motors will be made in concert with computer manufacturers. Liquid fuels allow indepedent manufacturing of non-computerized engines. In other words, the former is apples to apples, the latter is apples to oranges.
Another piece to this puzzle sheds some light on the true Government agenda. Not long ago, Google did a computer-GPS automobile control test run with one of their devices. Google deemed it a success, and inevitably will begin to find ways to sell this product.
Keeping in mind that Google & the White House have an unnatural relationship, it begs the question: Does the Government intend for us to ride in Government mandated, computer controlled vehicles? With such technology, an authoritarian will say to himself: "They don't NEED a car. They're helpless cattle. We need a super-computer with this Google GPS technology to eliminate automobile ownership. If they need to go somewhere, WE will provide a centralized Google brain that will eliminate day-to-day drivers. Need to go to the voting booth? Press a button, and your OBAMA car will be at your squat in half-an-hour, just like Domino's!"
Seriously, though, the Government wants to mandate computer controlled emergency braking on ALL vehicles. This is telling. Government wants to END automobile ownership. The clues are there. One simply has to put them together.
The two most prominent alternative fuel sources are bio-fuels (ethanol) & electric motors (large blenders). As we move towards both of these, we begin to notice that bio-fuels are the preferred choice for private sector fuel companies. Have you seen the Mobil ads? "Biofuel breakthroughs" & the like.
As for electric motors, it's crystal clear what OBAMA wants for all of us to be driving: a blender-on-wheels. After the takeover of General Motors, the White House has made a concerted effort to encourage the purchase of the Chevrolet Volt, a 40-mile-a-charge, $40k, overpriced, failed attempt at getting us to buy "electric".
Also, let's remember that Obama gave $2 billion to Brazil for their own oil exploration, a country that is more advanced in bio-fuel technology than we are. A country that uses ethanol more regularly.
Let's not forget the uber-Government UN's negative view towards ethanol. They, too, have disdain for what amounts to, for all intents & purposes, an ALTERNATIVE liquid fuel component, one that might actually help alleviate the coming oil crisis.
We also have this "food-safety" bill that was forced upon us by the 111th Senate, a very unpopular bill that will affect the production of ETHANOL. This may explain the reason Harry Reid deemed it so vital, it had to pass before the new Congress took effect.
I began to wonder about all of this. We have a "go green" mentality, but there are two distinctly different goals here. Why is the Government not openly supporting bio-fuels? What happened to GREEN?
The difference between a liquid fuel & an electric motor, is that, at some level, electric motors will be made in concert with computer manufacturers. Liquid fuels allow indepedent manufacturing of non-computerized engines. In other words, the former is apples to apples, the latter is apples to oranges.
Another piece to this puzzle sheds some light on the true Government agenda. Not long ago, Google did a computer-GPS automobile control test run with one of their devices. Google deemed it a success, and inevitably will begin to find ways to sell this product.
Keeping in mind that Google & the White House have an unnatural relationship, it begs the question: Does the Government intend for us to ride in Government mandated, computer controlled vehicles? With such technology, an authoritarian will say to himself: "They don't NEED a car. They're helpless cattle. We need a super-computer with this Google GPS technology to eliminate automobile ownership. If they need to go somewhere, WE will provide a centralized Google brain that will eliminate day-to-day drivers. Need to go to the voting booth? Press a button, and your OBAMA car will be at your squat in half-an-hour, just like Domino's!"
Seriously, though, the Government wants to mandate computer controlled emergency braking on ALL vehicles. This is telling. Government wants to END automobile ownership. The clues are there. One simply has to put them together.
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Liberal thinking 101 (my oldie but goodie)
A. AIDS is not the fault of decadent behaviour of those afflicted. It is the fault of greedy people that don't want the government to steal their money for the research to cure it
B. It is more important to determine at conception who is prone to a genetic disease than it is to cure it. Society needn't be financially burdened with humans that need constant medical care. Encourage or force mothers to abort, even partial-birth
C. Victims of genetically acquired diseases don't deserve mercy. Their mothers are responsible for not aborting them
D. The elderly have outlived their usefulness. Their resources must be confiscated and their health care eliminated
E. Wars happen because evil nations try to defend themselves
F. God may or may not exist, but Government is certain and must be given authority to control our lives
G. People that have the audacity to better their lives and those around them need to be punished. How dare they even think they can make the world better?
H. Worsen the lives of those around you. No matter how bad life gets, you have the comfort of knowing your neighbor is suffering, too.
B. It is more important to determine at conception who is prone to a genetic disease than it is to cure it. Society needn't be financially burdened with humans that need constant medical care. Encourage or force mothers to abort, even partial-birth
C. Victims of genetically acquired diseases don't deserve mercy. Their mothers are responsible for not aborting them
D. The elderly have outlived their usefulness. Their resources must be confiscated and their health care eliminated
E. Wars happen because evil nations try to defend themselves
F. God may or may not exist, but Government is certain and must be given authority to control our lives
G. People that have the audacity to better their lives and those around them need to be punished. How dare they even think they can make the world better?
H. Worsen the lives of those around you. No matter how bad life gets, you have the comfort of knowing your neighbor is suffering, too.
Monday, December 27, 2010
The case for Ken Cuccinelli
Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty, Mitch Daniels, John Boehner, Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee, Newt Gingrich, even Rick Perry & Marco Rubio have been mentioned.
And yes, I'm sure half-a-dozen of you are upset that I left out your choice for the 2012 election. I'm sorry, OK? How was I to know we would be facing all this chaos?
But I digress. This, being a rare post for me, is about why I think Virginia AG Ken Cuccinelli is easily the most qualified potential candidate for POTUS in 2012. Let's start a campaign. "KC & the Sunshine plan". Something like that. I don't do that sort of stuff, but maybe one of you can.
1st, lemme try to cover the other top candidates as briefly as possible. Let's start with Romney.
Romey's Dad was George Romney who is credited with attaining wealth from the auto industry, who subsequently put that into the Hotel industry. Glenn Beck likes him, had a nice story about him in 08, etc.
My take? Romney is a silver-spooner. It's not that he's a bad guy, but that experiment in Massachusetts with socialized health care puts him out to pasture.
Sarah Palin. Need I say more? I don't have a knock on her. I pulled the lever for her in 08. Nothing's changed here. My concern is that the extra-curricular stuff could be used to falsley portray her as some sort of zealot. Liberals are so jealous of her they can't see straight.
Pawlenty & Huckabee are too soft towards liberals. I see confusion, or lack of pure conviction, in both of them.
Boehner has made some boo-boos along the way, and at times appears to be easily confused. The crying thing I had no problem with, but potential voters might. His strength is his ability to endure. I'm impressed he's survived thru the Gingrich & Pelosi years to be Speaker now.
Which brings me to Newt. Ahhh, Newt. You broke our hearts when you supported Scozzafava. I'm sorry, but that fiasco exposed your desire to stay in the establishment fray. No way Newt-ay.
Rubio & Perry both need to be seen in action. Let's see what they're made of. Perry's been in for a little while, so far, so good.
What I know of Daniels makes him my 3rd choice.
Which brings me to the Virginia AG, Ken Cuccinelli. While all of the other potential candidates have seen action with mixed results, this individual has done something all of the others have yet to accomplish: he DEFEATED the Obama agenda, head on, IN HIS FIRST ATTEMPT.
What's the significance of this? Consider all of the lawsuits that have been brought to the Federal courts by various individuals in the last year or so and have failed & had to be appealed. Yes, I know we have hack judges in the system, yadda yadda yadda. But this also exemplifies the command of the Constitution by the various suing parties.
Go to YouTube & watch a few of Cuccinelli's press conferences, interviews, etc. I have yet to see an individual with the command of COTUS that Ken Cuccinelli has. Also, he is an authentic, classic, Ben Franklin libertarian. We, the glorious United States of America, need someone with instant command of COTUS to correct the horrific legal mess created by the current administration. I believe Ken Cuccinelli is the best Patriot for the job.
That's my case & I'm sticking to it (Someone make pins & T-shirts already).
And yes, I'm sure half-a-dozen of you are upset that I left out your choice for the 2012 election. I'm sorry, OK? How was I to know we would be facing all this chaos?
But I digress. This, being a rare post for me, is about why I think Virginia AG Ken Cuccinelli is easily the most qualified potential candidate for POTUS in 2012. Let's start a campaign. "KC & the Sunshine plan". Something like that. I don't do that sort of stuff, but maybe one of you can.
1st, lemme try to cover the other top candidates as briefly as possible. Let's start with Romney.
Romey's Dad was George Romney who is credited with attaining wealth from the auto industry, who subsequently put that into the Hotel industry. Glenn Beck likes him, had a nice story about him in 08, etc.
My take? Romney is a silver-spooner. It's not that he's a bad guy, but that experiment in Massachusetts with socialized health care puts him out to pasture.
Sarah Palin. Need I say more? I don't have a knock on her. I pulled the lever for her in 08. Nothing's changed here. My concern is that the extra-curricular stuff could be used to falsley portray her as some sort of zealot. Liberals are so jealous of her they can't see straight.
Pawlenty & Huckabee are too soft towards liberals. I see confusion, or lack of pure conviction, in both of them.
Boehner has made some boo-boos along the way, and at times appears to be easily confused. The crying thing I had no problem with, but potential voters might. His strength is his ability to endure. I'm impressed he's survived thru the Gingrich & Pelosi years to be Speaker now.
Which brings me to Newt. Ahhh, Newt. You broke our hearts when you supported Scozzafava. I'm sorry, but that fiasco exposed your desire to stay in the establishment fray. No way Newt-ay.
Rubio & Perry both need to be seen in action. Let's see what they're made of. Perry's been in for a little while, so far, so good.
What I know of Daniels makes him my 3rd choice.
Which brings me to the Virginia AG, Ken Cuccinelli. While all of the other potential candidates have seen action with mixed results, this individual has done something all of the others have yet to accomplish: he DEFEATED the Obama agenda, head on, IN HIS FIRST ATTEMPT.
What's the significance of this? Consider all of the lawsuits that have been brought to the Federal courts by various individuals in the last year or so and have failed & had to be appealed. Yes, I know we have hack judges in the system, yadda yadda yadda. But this also exemplifies the command of the Constitution by the various suing parties.
Go to YouTube & watch a few of Cuccinelli's press conferences, interviews, etc. I have yet to see an individual with the command of COTUS that Ken Cuccinelli has. Also, he is an authentic, classic, Ben Franklin libertarian. We, the glorious United States of America, need someone with instant command of COTUS to correct the horrific legal mess created by the current administration. I believe Ken Cuccinelli is the best Patriot for the job.
That's my case & I'm sticking to it (Someone make pins & T-shirts already).
Thursday, October 14, 2010
CHRYSLER: A Very Dirty Story
Sooner or later it will all come to light!
This could be a scandal of epic proportions and one that makes Nixon's Watergate or Clinton 's Monica Lewinsky affair pale by comparison.
Why was there neither rhyme nor reason as to which dealerships of the Chrysler Corporation were to be closed?
Roll the clock back to the weeks just before Chrysler declared bankruptcy. Chrysler, like GM, was in dire financial straits and federal government "graciously" offered to "buy the company" and keep them out of bankruptcy and "save jobs."
Chrysler was, in the words of Obama and his administration, "Too big to fail," same story with GM.
The feds organized their "Automotive Task Force" to fix Chrysler and GM. Obama, in an act that is 100% unconstitutional, appointed a guy named Steve Rattner to be the White House's official Car Czar - literally, that's what his title is.
Rattner is the liaison between Obama, Chrysler, and GM.
Initially, the national media reported that Chrysler 'had made this list of dealerships'. Not true!
The Washington Examiner, Newsmax, Fox News and a host of other news agencies discovered that the list of dealerships was put together by the "Automotive Task Force" headed by no one other than Mr. Steve Rattner.
Now the plot thickens.
Remember earlier we said that there was neither rhyme nor reason why certain dealerships were closed?
Actually there's a very interesting pattern as to who was closed down. Again, on May 27, 2009, The Washington Examiner and Newsmax exposed the connection.
Amazingly, of the 789 dealerships closed by the federal government, 788 had donated money, exclusively to Republican political causes, while contributing nothing to Democratic political causes. The only "Democratic" dealership on the list was found to have donated $7,700 to Hillary's campaign, and a bit over $2,000 to John Edwards. This same dealership, reportedly, also gave $200.00 to Obama's campaign.
Does that seem a little odd to you?
Steve Rattner is the guy who put the list together. Well, he happens to be married to a Maureen White. Maureen happens to be the former national finance chairman of the Democratic National Committee. As such, she has access to campaign donation records from everyone in the nation- Republican or Democrat. But of course, this is just a wacky "coincidence," we're certain.
Then comes another really wacky "coincidence."
On that list of dealerships being closed down, a weird thing happened in Arkansas , North Louisiana, and Southern Missouri .. It seems that Bill Clinton's former White House Chief of Staff, Mack McClarty, owns a chain of dealership in that region, partnered with a fellow by the name of Robert Johnson.
Johnson happens to be founder of Black Entertainment Television and was a huge Obama supporter and financier.
These guys own a half dozen Chrysler stores under the company title of RLJ-McClarty-Landers. Interestingly, none of their dealerships were ordered closed - not one! While all of their competing Chrysler/Dodge and Jeep dealership were!
Eight dealerships located near the dealerships owned by McClarty and Johnson were ordered shut down. Thus by pure luck, these two major Obama supporters now have virtual monopoly on Chrysler sales in their zone. Isn't that amazing?
Go look in The Washington Examiner, the story's there, and it's in a dozen or so other web-based news organizations; this isn't being made up.
Now if you thought Chrysler was owned by Fiat, you are mistaken. Under the federal court ruling, 65% of Chrysler is now owned by the federal government and the United Auto Workers union! Fiat owns 20%. The other 15% is still privately owned and presumably will be traded on the stock market.
Obama smiles and says he doesn't want to run the auto industry.
As horrifying as this is to comprehend, and being as how this used to be the United States of America, it would appear that the president has the power to destroy private businesses and eliminate upwards of 100,000 jobs just because they don't agree with his political agenda.
This is Nazi Germany stuff, and it's happening right here, right now, in our back yard.
There are voices in Washington demanding an explanation, but the "Automotive Task Force" has released no information to the public or to any of the senators demanding answers for what has been done.
Keep your ear to the ground for more on this story. If you've ever wanted to make a difference about anything in your life, get on the phone to your national senator or representative in the House and demand an investigation into this.
Benjamin Franklin had it right when he said, "All that's necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."
Car Czar No More
An amazing thing happened as this story was going to press. Obama's Car Czar, Steve Rattner, resigned on July 13 and was promptly replaced by former steel workers union boss Ron Bloom.
According to CBS News, Rattner left "to return to private life and spend time with his family."
Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said, "I hope that he takes another opportunity to bring his unique skills to government service in the future."
By the way, Rattner is under investigation for a multi-million dollar pay-to-play investment bank scandal in New York ....
Uh-oh!
But, we're certain that had nothing to do with his resignation. And, according to several news sources out there, there are rumors he's being investigated for what could be pay-to-play scandal involving the closing of Chrysler and GM dealerships. Really?
Again, that couldn't have anything to with his resignation-that's ridiculous!
Like CBS said, this guy just wants to "spend more quality time with his family."
Obama has 32 personally appointed "czars" who answer to no one but him, all of whom are acting without any Constitutional authority. But hey, we're sure they all have "unique skills,"... as Tim Geithner likes to say!
SOOOOO. HOWS THE CHANGE WORKING FOR YOU?..
Check it out at the following websites.....
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Furor-grows-over-partisan-car-dealer-closings-46261447.html
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Obamas-auto-policy-All-in-the-Democratic-family-44414452.html
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Obamas-auto-policy-All-in-the-Democratic-family-44414452.html
This goes from beyond corruption in high places - to gross criminal actions on the part of our government!
I hope you will spread this far and wide, and hopefully the taxpaying public will demand some of that transparency we were promised...... followed by criminal prosecution of the perpetrators!
What a crooked government, we have!!!!!
Vote 'em all out... November, 2010!
This could be a scandal of epic proportions and one that makes Nixon's Watergate or Clinton 's Monica Lewinsky affair pale by comparison.
Why was there neither rhyme nor reason as to which dealerships of the Chrysler Corporation were to be closed?
Roll the clock back to the weeks just before Chrysler declared bankruptcy. Chrysler, like GM, was in dire financial straits and federal government "graciously" offered to "buy the company" and keep them out of bankruptcy and "save jobs."
Chrysler was, in the words of Obama and his administration, "Too big to fail," same story with GM.
The feds organized their "Automotive Task Force" to fix Chrysler and GM. Obama, in an act that is 100% unconstitutional, appointed a guy named Steve Rattner to be the White House's official Car Czar - literally, that's what his title is.
Rattner is the liaison between Obama, Chrysler, and GM.
Initially, the national media reported that Chrysler 'had made this list of dealerships'. Not true!
The Washington Examiner, Newsmax, Fox News and a host of other news agencies discovered that the list of dealerships was put together by the "Automotive Task Force" headed by no one other than Mr. Steve Rattner.
Now the plot thickens.
Remember earlier we said that there was neither rhyme nor reason why certain dealerships were closed?
Actually there's a very interesting pattern as to who was closed down. Again, on May 27, 2009, The Washington Examiner and Newsmax exposed the connection.
Amazingly, of the 789 dealerships closed by the federal government, 788 had donated money, exclusively to Republican political causes, while contributing nothing to Democratic political causes. The only "Democratic" dealership on the list was found to have donated $7,700 to Hillary's campaign, and a bit over $2,000 to John Edwards. This same dealership, reportedly, also gave $200.00 to Obama's campaign.
Does that seem a little odd to you?
Steve Rattner is the guy who put the list together. Well, he happens to be married to a Maureen White. Maureen happens to be the former national finance chairman of the Democratic National Committee. As such, she has access to campaign donation records from everyone in the nation- Republican or Democrat. But of course, this is just a wacky "coincidence," we're certain.
Then comes another really wacky "coincidence."
On that list of dealerships being closed down, a weird thing happened in Arkansas , North Louisiana, and Southern Missouri .. It seems that Bill Clinton's former White House Chief of Staff, Mack McClarty, owns a chain of dealership in that region, partnered with a fellow by the name of Robert Johnson.
Johnson happens to be founder of Black Entertainment Television and was a huge Obama supporter and financier.
These guys own a half dozen Chrysler stores under the company title of RLJ-McClarty-Landers. Interestingly, none of their dealerships were ordered closed - not one! While all of their competing Chrysler/Dodge and Jeep dealership were!
Eight dealerships located near the dealerships owned by McClarty and Johnson were ordered shut down. Thus by pure luck, these two major Obama supporters now have virtual monopoly on Chrysler sales in their zone. Isn't that amazing?
Go look in The Washington Examiner, the story's there, and it's in a dozen or so other web-based news organizations; this isn't being made up.
Now if you thought Chrysler was owned by Fiat, you are mistaken. Under the federal court ruling, 65% of Chrysler is now owned by the federal government and the United Auto Workers union! Fiat owns 20%. The other 15% is still privately owned and presumably will be traded on the stock market.
Obama smiles and says he doesn't want to run the auto industry.
As horrifying as this is to comprehend, and being as how this used to be the United States of America, it would appear that the president has the power to destroy private businesses and eliminate upwards of 100,000 jobs just because they don't agree with his political agenda.
This is Nazi Germany stuff, and it's happening right here, right now, in our back yard.
There are voices in Washington demanding an explanation, but the "Automotive Task Force" has released no information to the public or to any of the senators demanding answers for what has been done.
Keep your ear to the ground for more on this story. If you've ever wanted to make a difference about anything in your life, get on the phone to your national senator or representative in the House and demand an investigation into this.
Benjamin Franklin had it right when he said, "All that's necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."
Car Czar No More
An amazing thing happened as this story was going to press. Obama's Car Czar, Steve Rattner, resigned on July 13 and was promptly replaced by former steel workers union boss Ron Bloom.
According to CBS News, Rattner left "to return to private life and spend time with his family."
Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said, "I hope that he takes another opportunity to bring his unique skills to government service in the future."
By the way, Rattner is under investigation for a multi-million dollar pay-to-play investment bank scandal in New York ....
Uh-oh!
But, we're certain that had nothing to do with his resignation. And, according to several news sources out there, there are rumors he's being investigated for what could be pay-to-play scandal involving the closing of Chrysler and GM dealerships. Really?
Again, that couldn't have anything to with his resignation-that's ridiculous!
Like CBS said, this guy just wants to "spend more quality time with his family."
Obama has 32 personally appointed "czars" who answer to no one but him, all of whom are acting without any Constitutional authority. But hey, we're sure they all have "unique skills,"... as Tim Geithner likes to say!
SOOOOO. HOWS THE CHANGE WORKING FOR YOU?..
Check it out at the following websites.....
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Furor-grows-over-partisan-car-dealer-closings-46261447.html
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Obamas-auto-policy-All-in-the-Democratic-family-44414452.html
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Obamas-auto-policy-All-in-the-Democratic-family-44414452.html
This goes from beyond corruption in high places - to gross criminal actions on the part of our government!
I hope you will spread this far and wide, and hopefully the taxpaying public will demand some of that transparency we were promised...... followed by criminal prosecution of the perpetrators!
What a crooked government, we have!!!!!
Vote 'em all out... November, 2010!
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Chapter 3 - The System of Rectangular Surveys
3-1. The extension of the rectangular system of public land surveys over the public domain in the United States has been in progress since 1785. Although few of the original surveys now being made cover extensive areas, all facets of the rectangular system occasionally come into use. For this reason, and to make clear the procedures which have been followed in surveying public lands, a complete discussion of the system is included in this manual. It will be seen that the underlying principle is to provide a simple and certain form of land identification and legal description of the public lands.
GENERAL SCHEME
3-2. The law provides that (1) the public lands of the United States shall be divided by lines intersecting true north and south lines at right angles so as to form townships six miles square; (2) the townships shall be marked with progressive numbers from the beginning; (3) the townships shall be subdivided into 36 sections, each one mile square and containing 640 acres as nearly as may be; and (4) the sections shall be numbered, respectively, beginning with the number 1 in the northeast sections, and proceeding west and east alternately through the township with progressive numbers to and including 36 (R.S. 2395; 43 U.S.C. 751).
3-3. In accordance with the foregoing legal requirements, the public lands are surveyed under the method called the system of rectangular surveys, which embraces the following procedure:
(1) The establishment of independent initial points, each to serve as an origin for surveys to be extended in separated localities.
(2) The survey of principal meridians and base lines, originating at the initial points.
(3) The establishment of guide meridians initiated at base lines, and of standard parallels initiated at principal meridians, at intervals short enough to maintain a workable adherence to the legal definition of the primary unit, the township six miles square.
(4) The survey of township exteriors within the framework so established. Townships are numbered to the north or south commencing with number 1 at the base line, and with range numbers to the east or west beginning with number 1 at the principal meridian.
(5) The subdivision of the townships into 36 sections by running parallel lines through the township from south to north and from east to west at distances of one mile. The sections are numbered commencing with number 1 in the northeast section of the township, proceeding thence west to section 6, thence south to section 7, thence east to section 12, and so on, alternately, to number 36 in the southeast section.
3-4. By law, (1) the corners marked in public land surveys shall be established as the proper corners of sections, or of the subdivisions of the sections, which they were intended to designate, and (2) the boundary lines actually run and marked shall be and remain the proper boundary lines of the sections or subdivisions for which they were intended, and the lengths of these lines as returned shall be held as the true length thereof (R.S. 2396; 43 U.S.C. 752). The original corners must stand as the true corners they were intended to represent, even though not exactly where professional care might have placed them in the first instance. Missing corners must be reestablished in the identical positions they originally occupied. When the positions cannot be determined by existing monuments or other verifying evidence, resort must be had to the field notes of the original survey. The law provides that the lengths of the lines, as returned in the field notes, shall be held as the true lengths, and the distances between identified corner positions given in the field notes constitute proper data from which to determine the position of a lost corner; hence the rule that lost corners are restored at distances proportionate to the original measurements between identified positions. (chapter V, Restoration of Lost Corners.)
3-5. In the sections that follow, the first explanations are with respect to ideal procedure in the rectangular plan. The plan must be modified in various ways in order to begin new work where the initial and closing lines already established by prior survey do not qualify under the current specifications for rectangularity and closure but cannot now be changed because of the passing of titles based on them. The purpose is to avoid the incorporation of the discrepancies of the older lines in the running of new original surveys.
INITIAL POINTS
3-6. During the period since the organization of the system of rectangular surveys, numbered and locally named principal meridians and base lines have been established as listed in the accompanying table. These bases and meridians are shown on the large wall map of the United States published by the Bureau of Land Management, on a special map entitled "Principal Meridians and Base Lines Governing the United States Public Land Surveys" published by the Bureau, and on the various State maps and topographic maps published by the United States Geological Survey.
Meridians and Base Lines of the United States Rectangular Surveys
Initial Points
Meridian Adopted Governing surveys (wholly or in part) in States of Latitude
° ' "
Longitude
° ' "
Black Hills 1878 South Dakota 43 59 44 104 03 16
Boise 1867 Idaho 43 22 21 116 23 35
Chickasaw 1833 Mississippi 35 01 58 89 14 47
Choctaw 1821 --do-- 31 52 32 90 14 41
Cimarron 1881 Oklahoma 36 30 05 103 00 07
Copper River 1905 Alaska 61 49 04 145 18 37
Fairbanks 1910 --do-- 64 51 50.048 147 38 25.949
Fifth Principal 1815 Arkansas, Iowa
Minnesota,
Missouri,
North Dakota,
and
South Dakota
34 38 45 91 03 07
First Principal 1819 Ohio & Indiana 40 59 22 84 48 11
Fourth Principal 1815 Illinois 40 00 50 90 27 11
--do-- 1831 Minnesota, &
Wisconsin
42 30 27 90 25 37
Gila and Salt River 1865 Arizona 33 22 38 112 18 19
Humboldt 1853 California 40 35 02 124 07 10
Huntsville 1807 Alabama &
Mississippi
34 59 27 86 34 16
Indian 1870 Oklahoma 34 29 32 97 14 49
Kateel River 1956 Alaska 65 26 16.374 158 45 31.014
Louisiana 1807 Louisiana 31 00 31 92 24 55
Michigan 1815 Michigan & Ohio 42 25 28 84 21 53
Mount Diablo 1851 California & Nevada 37 52 54 121 54 47
Navajo 1869 Arizona 35 44 56 108 31 59
New Mexico
Principal
1855 Colorado &
New Mexico
34 15 35 106 53 12
Principal 1867 Montana 45 47 13 111 39 33
Salt Lake 1855 Utah 40 46 11 111 53 27
San Bernardino 1852 California 34 07 13 116 55 48
Second Principal 1805 Illinois & Indiana 38 28 14 86 27 21
Seward 1911 Alaska 60 07 37 149 21 26
Sixth
Principal
1855 Colorado,
Kansas,
Nebraska,S. Dakota,
Wyoming
40 00 07 97 22 08
St. Helena 1819 Louisiana 30 59 56 91 09 36
St. Stephens 1805 Alabama &
Mississippi
30 59 51 88 01 20
Tallahassee 1824 Florida &
Alabama
30 26 03 84 16 38
Third Principal 1805 Illinois 38 28 27 89 08 54
Unitah 1875 Utah 40 25 59 109 56 06
Umiat 1956 Alaska 69 23 29.654 152 00 04.551
Ute 1880 Colorado 39 06 23 108 31 59
Washington 1803 Mississippi 30 59 56 91 09 36
Willamette 1851 Oregon & Washington 45 31 11 122 44 34
Wind River 1875 Wyoming 43 00 41 108 48 49
3-7. The rectangular system was initiated in the State of Ohio in 1785 from a point on the west boundary of Pennsylvania, on the north shore of the Ohio River, in longitude 80°32'20". The State boundary served as the first reference meridian. A number of other reference meridians and bases were employed in Ohio to govern particular areas for purposes of disposal. In its early stages the system was somewhat experimental, and Ohio may well be referred to as the proving ground for the present rectangular system of surveys. The rectangular surveys that have no initial point as an origin of township identification are listed in the following table.
Public Land Surveys Having No Initial Point as an Origin for Both Township and Range Numbers
Survey (and year commenced)
Townships numbered
Ranges numbered
Ohio River Survey 1785
(Ohio)
North from Ohio River West from west
boundary of Pennsylvania
U.S. Military Survey 1797
(Ohio)
North from south boundary of military grant West from west boundary of the Seven Ranges
West of the Great 1798
Miami (Ohio)
North from Great Miami River East from Ohio- Indiana boundary
Ohio River Base 1799
(Indiana)
North from Ohio River From Ohio-Indiana boundary and its projection south
Scioto River Base 1799 (Ohio) North from Scioto River West from west boundary of Pennsylvania
Muskingrum River 1800 Survey(Ohio) 1 and 2 10
Between the Miamis 1802 , North of Symmes Purchase (Ohio) East from Great
Miami River
North from Ohio River (continuing numbers from
Symmes Purchase)
Twelve-Mile-Square 1805
Reserve (Ohio)
1, 2, 3, and 4 None
PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN
3-8. A principal meridian is intended to conform to the true meridian, extending north or south, or in both directions, from the initial point as conditions require. Regular quarter-section and section corners are established alternately at intervals of 40 chains, and regular township corners at intervals of 480 chains. Corners designated as meander corners are established at the intersection of the line with meanderable bodies of water.
3-9. In the survey of the principal meridian and other standard lines (base lines, standard parallels, and guide meridians), two independent sets of measurements are made, but only the mean of the two measurements is shown in the final field notes. Double measurement may be omitted if subdivisional closings are provided in the same assignment with the standard line, in which case the closings furnish a verification of the length.
Should the difference between the two sets of measurements of a standard line exceed 7 links per 80 chains, the line is remeasured to reduce the difference. Should independent tests of the alinement of a standard line indicate that the line has deflected more than 3 minutes from the true cardinal course, the line must be rerun. These are the maximum discrepancies allowable in new surveys.
BASE LINE
3-10. The base line is extended east and west from the initial point on a true parallel of latitude. Standard quarter-section and section corners are established alternately at intervals of 40 chains and standard township corners at intervals of 480 chains. Meander corners are established where the line intersects meanderable bodies of water.
3-11. The manner of making the measurement of the base line and the accuracy of alinement and measurement are the same as required in the survey of the principal meridian. The determination of the alinement of the true latitude curve may be made by the solar method, the tangent method, or the secant method as conditions require. The detailed process is described in the field notes.
STANDARD PARALLELS
3-12. Standard parallels, which are also called correction lines, are extended east and west from the principal meridian, at intervals of 24 miles north and south of the base line, in the manner prescribed for the survey of the base line.
3-13. Where standard parallels previously have been placed at intervals of 30 or 36 miles, and present conditions require additional standard lines, an intermediate correction line is established to which a local name may be given, such as "Fifth Auxiliary Standard Parallel North," or "Cedar Creek Correction Line," run, in all respects, like a regular standard parallel.
Monday, August 02, 2010
Thursday, July 29, 2010
Saturday, April 03, 2010
Dem truth IS Socialist fiction (part 2)
I want to add to my previous post, to enlighten my readers further as to this Government's mindset and why I've come to these conclusions on "health care" versus what this new law actually leads to.
Lemme take you back to the deal big Pharma made with Obama. Everyone, and I mean EVERYONE, Left & Right, was up in arms about it. As we've seen with POTUS before, every deal any entity has done with Obama has yielded the same results: Obama sets them up to take the fall for some crisis he creates. I believe Pharma is being set-up too. Turn those who can't pay Obama's unreasonable taxes into human lab rats to pay it back (or worse yet, use their family members), then blame Pharma as the evil corporate GOP donor that got away with profitting off the backs of the destitute!
Let's consider for a moment that POTUS wants illegals given amnesty. Who are these illegals? Most don't care about America, are simply sending money back to their families in Central America. Obama just signed a new EO (or law?) imposing taxes on money invested abroad.
Who in America sends untaxed money abroad? ILLEGALS of course! If you legalize them all, they have to join unions, pay union dues, and oh yeah! Sending money to your starving kid in Mexico? Good luck trying! POTUS just legalized you! Now get your RFID surgically implanted and pay up! Trying to escape? No way José!!!! Obama will TRACK YOU DOWN!
RFID serves another purpose: anyone that thinks about leaving America won't want to come back. Anyone entering the country will have to be tagged. If it's not law now, it will be soon. Obama is trying to turn America into one gigantic gulag for his to abuse.
Illegals are getting set up. After Obama legalizes them, he will tax them into complete poverty, to the point they can't even afford to return to their home country!
Lemme take you back to the deal big Pharma made with Obama. Everyone, and I mean EVERYONE, Left & Right, was up in arms about it. As we've seen with POTUS before, every deal any entity has done with Obama has yielded the same results: Obama sets them up to take the fall for some crisis he creates. I believe Pharma is being set-up too. Turn those who can't pay Obama's unreasonable taxes into human lab rats to pay it back (or worse yet, use their family members), then blame Pharma as the evil corporate GOP donor that got away with profitting off the backs of the destitute!
Let's consider for a moment that POTUS wants illegals given amnesty. Who are these illegals? Most don't care about America, are simply sending money back to their families in Central America. Obama just signed a new EO (or law?) imposing taxes on money invested abroad.
Who in America sends untaxed money abroad? ILLEGALS of course! If you legalize them all, they have to join unions, pay union dues, and oh yeah! Sending money to your starving kid in Mexico? Good luck trying! POTUS just legalized you! Now get your RFID surgically implanted and pay up! Trying to escape? No way José!!!! Obama will TRACK YOU DOWN!
RFID serves another purpose: anyone that thinks about leaving America won't want to come back. Anyone entering the country will have to be tagged. If it's not law now, it will be soon. Obama is trying to turn America into one gigantic gulag for his to abuse.
Illegals are getting set up. After Obama legalizes them, he will tax them into complete poverty, to the point they can't even afford to return to their home country!
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Democrat truth is stranger than Socialist fiction
There's far more that will be disclosed about the supposed "health care" legislation that's been passed by Washington DC the last few weeks, but there is substantial that has already been revealed from which we can make some educated conclusions that are readily apparent to anyone that has studied history & enlightening futuristic social fiction literature, and further, goes right to the heart of human depravity on the radical left, and the fascist-elitists that influence our Government.
Firstly, we have a situation here where Washington DC, with these new medical laws, has essentially hijacked the medical industry in America. Initially, I was on board with the thought that DC actually thinks they own us, which they do think to some degree, but right now, we're useful for them to achieve their goals. We still have assets from which to confiscate, and we can be distracted to keep everyone's eye off the proverbial ball.
Now for the specifics.
There is this jaw-dropping portion of the Reconciliation law, HR 4872 ( http://3.ly/Sy3W ), which makes microchip implantation into people (and I stress 'people', not citizens) that get medical attention mandatory. I began to wonder just how brazen this kind of legislation is. Americans simply will not accept this, I thought. Washington can't be that confrontational with us yet, can they? We've won popular opinion, they know we have, but yet they did it anyway. It's contradictory to their nature. So, why else would they do it?
Let's consider for a moment their methods, their psyche, and their belief-less existence. There is a purpose for passing this legislation in this manner, and it's NOT meant for us, at least, not right now. History teaches us that human tagging is a way to devalue human life. The radical left and fascist-elitists share one thing in common: GREED. Radicals and Fascists both put a price tag on human life. In their minds, taxpayers are slightly more valuable "cattle". Confronting taxpayers directly with immorality is costly, however, using taxpayers to create distractions is useful to their primitive and depraved goals.
The last few decades has seen several wars that have put America in a position to defend human & national dignities abroad. Almost 25 years ago, President Ronald Reagan gave amnesty to a portion of those immigrants that were here at the time. Consider also, that drug manufacturers and animal rights activists (i.e. radicals, home grown marxists) have been suspected on more than many occasions of colluding to bring about undisclosed goals. These, & many related issues, I believe, go to the core of radical marxist and fascist "moral equivalence" on our soil.
So what is the goal of these fascists and marxists? The illegal immigrant situation has been quite contentious for many years now. They've put a substantial strain on our social systems, primarily medical care. The response to this problem, for the immoral, is "use illegals to pay back what they've taken!" This thought makes Christians their biggest roadblock. Naturally, Christians will be the first to spot this inhumanity, they must be silenced. Catholicism being the largest, this institution was infiltrated first. Also, Catholics provide the most worldwide aid, including illegals.
The next group to spot this, that won't accept this indignity, is the everyday American Patriot. We are a nation of laws. Patriots just want the rule of law. Marxists think illegals pollute the earth. Fascists think illegals serve a financial purpose. The moral equivalence argument in their warped minds is that the greatest conservative President is at fault for having to make these "tough" choices. Heck, Bush? he killed thousands of foreigners with his unjust wars!
George Soros & others of his ilk, who already see human life with a price tag, is influencing this as well. There is no doubt that some of his behavior is payback, and some is Fascist profiteering. The moral equivalence factor against America is definitely in play here. He intends to damage America's credibility forever, using Washington DC to help him along. Also, people like Pelosi blame illegals for breaking California. Time to get some return.
OK, onto the RFID. Washington elites know America will resist the direct effort to tag. They will scream injustice. This will deflect from their real target: illegal immigrants. Remember this video 6 months ago?
Fascinating how all these things set in motion. This video evidences how
the RFID tags were supposed to go into effect after health care was
passed. Guard exercises? 6 months ago? The health laws were
supposed to have been enacted by then.
This video shows us the CDC was planning something as far back as
2000. This has been in the planning stages for some time now. The
Government is definitely hiding something, but I'm suspecting more and
more that either researchers have already broken laws, or that something
big is being planned. If current laws were already broken, then new laws
to insulate the perpetrators needs to be in effect. If they plan to use people
now, then payoffs have occurred to make this possible.
In a hurry to get illegal immigration on the board? Well, isn't that
convenient. More cattle from which to choose! Let's not forget the
expectation that Mexico is about to collapse. FEMA caskets? It seems like
many dead bodies are expected. Who are we going to war with? Mexico?
Gee, who would be most angry at the profiting of illegal immigrants from
medical experimentation?
Which now brings us to the Health Army component. Detaining millions
of illegals will create a civil incident. This Health Army will bring to bear
the full force of the executive branch onto society. Think Elian Gonzalez
on a massive scale. Don't get in the way. They will do what they want with
the illegals and no one will stop them. "Crying human rights violations?
You should've thought of that when you elected Republicans, you
hypocrites!"
Oh yeah! Let's not forget Cass Sunstein, who values animal rights over
basic human dignity. His purpose? To replace animal testing with human
testing, namely, illegal immigrants. That's the purpose of the Health Army
and the RFIDs, to "bag-n-tag." Someone very high up the Government
ladder long ago has come to the conclusion that illegal immigrants are the
imminent National Security threat.
America will be permanently stained internationally. Pray this sinister plan
fails.
Firstly, we have a situation here where Washington DC, with these new medical laws, has essentially hijacked the medical industry in America. Initially, I was on board with the thought that DC actually thinks they own us, which they do think to some degree, but right now, we're useful for them to achieve their goals. We still have assets from which to confiscate, and we can be distracted to keep everyone's eye off the proverbial ball.
Now for the specifics.
There is this jaw-dropping portion of the Reconciliation law, HR 4872 ( http://3.ly/Sy3W ), which makes microchip implantation into people (and I stress 'people', not citizens) that get medical attention mandatory. I began to wonder just how brazen this kind of legislation is. Americans simply will not accept this, I thought. Washington can't be that confrontational with us yet, can they? We've won popular opinion, they know we have, but yet they did it anyway. It's contradictory to their nature. So, why else would they do it?
Let's consider for a moment their methods, their psyche, and their belief-less existence. There is a purpose for passing this legislation in this manner, and it's NOT meant for us, at least, not right now. History teaches us that human tagging is a way to devalue human life. The radical left and fascist-elitists share one thing in common: GREED. Radicals and Fascists both put a price tag on human life. In their minds, taxpayers are slightly more valuable "cattle". Confronting taxpayers directly with immorality is costly, however, using taxpayers to create distractions is useful to their primitive and depraved goals.
The last few decades has seen several wars that have put America in a position to defend human & national dignities abroad. Almost 25 years ago, President Ronald Reagan gave amnesty to a portion of those immigrants that were here at the time. Consider also, that drug manufacturers and animal rights activists (i.e. radicals, home grown marxists) have been suspected on more than many occasions of colluding to bring about undisclosed goals. These, & many related issues, I believe, go to the core of radical marxist and fascist "moral equivalence" on our soil.
So what is the goal of these fascists and marxists? The illegal immigrant situation has been quite contentious for many years now. They've put a substantial strain on our social systems, primarily medical care. The response to this problem, for the immoral, is "use illegals to pay back what they've taken!" This thought makes Christians their biggest roadblock. Naturally, Christians will be the first to spot this inhumanity, they must be silenced. Catholicism being the largest, this institution was infiltrated first. Also, Catholics provide the most worldwide aid, including illegals.
The next group to spot this, that won't accept this indignity, is the everyday American Patriot. We are a nation of laws. Patriots just want the rule of law. Marxists think illegals pollute the earth. Fascists think illegals serve a financial purpose. The moral equivalence argument in their warped minds is that the greatest conservative President is at fault for having to make these "tough" choices. Heck, Bush? he killed thousands of foreigners with his unjust wars!
George Soros & others of his ilk, who already see human life with a price tag, is influencing this as well. There is no doubt that some of his behavior is payback, and some is Fascist profiteering. The moral equivalence factor against America is definitely in play here. He intends to damage America's credibility forever, using Washington DC to help him along. Also, people like Pelosi blame illegals for breaking California. Time to get some return.
OK, onto the RFID. Washington elites know America will resist the direct effort to tag. They will scream injustice. This will deflect from their real target: illegal immigrants. Remember this video 6 months ago?
Fascinating how all these things set in motion. This video evidences how
the RFID tags were supposed to go into effect after health care was
passed. Guard exercises? 6 months ago? The health laws were
supposed to have been enacted by then.
This video shows us the CDC was planning something as far back as
2000. This has been in the planning stages for some time now. The
Government is definitely hiding something, but I'm suspecting more and
more that either researchers have already broken laws, or that something
big is being planned. If current laws were already broken, then new laws
to insulate the perpetrators needs to be in effect. If they plan to use people
now, then payoffs have occurred to make this possible.
In a hurry to get illegal immigration on the board? Well, isn't that
convenient. More cattle from which to choose! Let's not forget the
expectation that Mexico is about to collapse. FEMA caskets? It seems like
many dead bodies are expected. Who are we going to war with? Mexico?
Gee, who would be most angry at the profiting of illegal immigrants from
medical experimentation?
Which now brings us to the Health Army component. Detaining millions
of illegals will create a civil incident. This Health Army will bring to bear
the full force of the executive branch onto society. Think Elian Gonzalez
on a massive scale. Don't get in the way. They will do what they want with
the illegals and no one will stop them. "Crying human rights violations?
You should've thought of that when you elected Republicans, you
hypocrites!"
Oh yeah! Let's not forget Cass Sunstein, who values animal rights over
basic human dignity. His purpose? To replace animal testing with human
testing, namely, illegal immigrants. That's the purpose of the Health Army
and the RFIDs, to "bag-n-tag." Someone very high up the Government
ladder long ago has come to the conclusion that illegal immigrants are the
imminent National Security threat.
America will be permanently stained internationally. Pray this sinister plan
fails.
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Washington, be careful what you wish for
All of the talk regarding health care and the bills that were recently passed has been that Washington wants control of it. Yes, it's true, but there is also the part that we forget, and that is how we savvy Americans may wind up adapting to this. I had a firestorm of thoughts regarding my last post that I'd like to share.
This health care bill is about control, not health care. Well, it's also NOT about other businesses that provide other services and/or goods. almost a year ago, my family and I walked into the local Wal-Mart and found the place had been turned upside-down. They had sectored off the middle of the store so no one could see what was going on inside.
Several weeks later, all was exposed. A huge pharmacy was revealed. The place is practically 1/4 waiting room. "How odd!" I thought. Many other related corporations in the area have also provided a small medical facility for walk-in medical care. This is the future of medical care. The fact is, many medical services have found ways around the high cost of insurance already. Many private, affordable walk-in clinics are already in place.
So what does this health care law do to the newer private clinics? It's going to substantially increase their patient lists! those 50 and under already find Doctor's offices that take Medicare/Medicaid a cumbersome experience. Here is what no one talking about. We've already begun to adapt to the Government intrusions and don't know it yet.
What are Democrat legislators after all, but prostitutes for their votes? How many lobbyists gamed the health care law along with campaign money for the company's benefit? What's in the law may potentially benefit both Doctors AND larger corporations, AND hurt Democrats in the process. Why? BECAUSE THEY TOOK MONEY AND DIDN'T READ THE BILL!!! The retail & medical industry are already merging to save costs for themselves. It's only a matter of time before non-retail/non-medical industries begin to figure this out.
Let's think about what a Doctor's office entails. The space, the equipment, the staff, the insurance, the salaries, the paperwork. All time consuming, all expensive. What's the difference at a larger corporation, other than the medical angle? This law will force Doctors into owning other types of businesses for income. Wal-Mart will give the Doctor stock in the company, along with a salary for his medical services, and provide a hybrid staff with the pharmacist/other. Guess what? Wal-Mart can provide their own insurance too! Voila! problem solved! Feds say "you can't pay the Doctor that much." Corporate says "Fine, we'll give him more stock, buy a car & yacht for corporate purposes, and lower his salary." In the process, Doctors WILL GET WEALTHIER as stockholders in another industry!
The Feds want to control what the Doctor OWNS the health care law says? Fine! Let the corporation own it, and the Doctor as stockholder can use it! A hundred ways to skin a cat. Large retail chains will come to arrangements with insurance companies to get around some of these ridiculous laws. The desire to overcome the poison that this law is could potentially force us to build stronger private community ties.
There simply is too much medical need that is being addressed in America that is already substantially cheaper than what the Government can possibly control. Large corporations can buffer Doctors by masking medical needs with pharmacy and other needs, and a quiet campaign contribution (yes, it stinks I know) will make them go away.
Anyways, as the reading of this law unfolds, some of this may have to be modified, but I think you catch my drift here.
This health care bill is about control, not health care. Well, it's also NOT about other businesses that provide other services and/or goods. almost a year ago, my family and I walked into the local Wal-Mart and found the place had been turned upside-down. They had sectored off the middle of the store so no one could see what was going on inside.
Several weeks later, all was exposed. A huge pharmacy was revealed. The place is practically 1/4 waiting room. "How odd!" I thought. Many other related corporations in the area have also provided a small medical facility for walk-in medical care. This is the future of medical care. The fact is, many medical services have found ways around the high cost of insurance already. Many private, affordable walk-in clinics are already in place.
So what does this health care law do to the newer private clinics? It's going to substantially increase their patient lists! those 50 and under already find Doctor's offices that take Medicare/Medicaid a cumbersome experience. Here is what no one talking about. We've already begun to adapt to the Government intrusions and don't know it yet.
What are Democrat legislators after all, but prostitutes for their votes? How many lobbyists gamed the health care law along with campaign money for the company's benefit? What's in the law may potentially benefit both Doctors AND larger corporations, AND hurt Democrats in the process. Why? BECAUSE THEY TOOK MONEY AND DIDN'T READ THE BILL!!! The retail & medical industry are already merging to save costs for themselves. It's only a matter of time before non-retail/non-medical industries begin to figure this out.
Let's think about what a Doctor's office entails. The space, the equipment, the staff, the insurance, the salaries, the paperwork. All time consuming, all expensive. What's the difference at a larger corporation, other than the medical angle? This law will force Doctors into owning other types of businesses for income. Wal-Mart will give the Doctor stock in the company, along with a salary for his medical services, and provide a hybrid staff with the pharmacist/other. Guess what? Wal-Mart can provide their own insurance too! Voila! problem solved! Feds say "you can't pay the Doctor that much." Corporate says "Fine, we'll give him more stock, buy a car & yacht for corporate purposes, and lower his salary." In the process, Doctors WILL GET WEALTHIER as stockholders in another industry!
The Feds want to control what the Doctor OWNS the health care law says? Fine! Let the corporation own it, and the Doctor as stockholder can use it! A hundred ways to skin a cat. Large retail chains will come to arrangements with insurance companies to get around some of these ridiculous laws. The desire to overcome the poison that this law is could potentially force us to build stronger private community ties.
There simply is too much medical need that is being addressed in America that is already substantially cheaper than what the Government can possibly control. Large corporations can buffer Doctors by masking medical needs with pharmacy and other needs, and a quiet campaign contribution (yes, it stinks I know) will make them go away.
Anyways, as the reading of this law unfolds, some of this may have to be modified, but I think you catch my drift here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
